Why can two different holdings still behave like one concentrated position?
A two-holding scenario worksheet shows why labels and holding counts do not determine how losses combine.
Explore a topic
Understand weights, diversification, losses, rebalancing and ongoing costs without treating an example as a personal allocation.
A two-holding scenario worksheet shows why labels and holding counts do not determine how losses combine.
A fixed-weight hypothetical worksheet separates an asset’s percentage decline from the loss it contributes to the total portfolio.
An original three-case worksheet compares a trade, a partial cash contribution, and a contribution allocation that reaches the same fictional target.
A two-year hypothetical calculation separates fees paid from the additional balance difference caused by a smaller amount remaining invested.
A two-period worksheet distinguishes the average of percentage returns from the constant rate that reproduces compound growth.
A peak-and-trough ledger calculates drawdown, remaining distance to recovery, and the larger percentage needed from a reduced balance.
An auditable two-year example links subperiod returns and solves a separate annual IRR using dated investor cash flows.
Construct capitalization-weighted and equal-weight toy indexes from the same three companies, then inspect their different influences.